Parental Stress, Infant Feeding and Well-being in Families Affected by Cleft Lip and/or Cleft Palate: The Impact of Early Follow-up.

OBJECTIVE: To document the impact of early follow-up by specialized cleft nurses (SCNs) provided to families affected by cleft lip and/or palate (CL/P) and the status of parental stress, infant feeding and well-being. DESIGN: Prospective inclusion of a control group, which only received standard care, followed by an intervention group that also received early SCN follow-up. SETTING: The cleft lip and palate team at Oslo University Hospital, Norway. PARTICIPANTS: Seventy families (69 mothers and 57 fathers) distributed into an intervention group (n = 32) and a control group (n = 38). INTERVENTION: SCNs provided a consultation at the maternity ward and a follow-up conversation by phone or face-to-face at scheduled times for six months. OUTCOME MEASURES: Parental Stress Index (PSI), Perceived Stress Scale (PSS-14), feeding questionnaire, survey of infant diets, weight percentiles. RESULTS: The mothers reported higher stress scores than the fathers, but in the control group only in the PSI parent domain at T2 and T3 (P = .007, P = .018). Infants in the intervention group used pacifiers less frequently than in the control group (55.2% vs. 81.1%, P = .023). Otherwise, no significant differences were found between the groups. Overall, the infants received less breast milk than norms. CONCLUSION: Contextual strategies for early follow-up of families affected by clefts need to be developed, with an emphasis on involving fathers and those parents reporting elevated stress and/or feeding difficulties. There is a need for diagnosis-specific guidelines about the use of pacifiers as well as collaboration between the health professionals involved to increase breastmilk feeding.

Early Follow-up of Parents by a Specialized Cleft Nurse After the Birth of an Infant with Cleft lip and/or Palate.

OBJECTIVE: To document the impact of early follow-up by specialized cleft nurses (SCNs) to families of infants with cleft lip and/or cleft palate (CL/P). DESIGN: Prospective inclusion of a control group, which received standard care alone, followed by an intervention group, which in addition received early SCN follow-up. SETTING: The cleft lip and palate team at a University hospital. PARTICIPANTS: 70 families (69 mothers and 57 fathers); control group (n = 38); intervention group (n = 32). INTERVENTION: SCNs offered a consultation at the maternity ward and follow-ups by phone or face-to-face at one, three, eight weeks and six months after birth. OUTCOME MEASURES: Use of Internet-Questionnaire, Quality of discharge teaching scale (QDTS), Post discharge coping difficulty scale (PDCDS), Response on follow-up by health professionals. RESULTS: Infants in the intervention group were admitted less frequently to a Neonatal Intensive Care unit (NICU); 21.9% vs 51.4%, P = .012. Parents in the intervention group used internet for cleft-related reasons less frequently (74.6% vs 85.9%), P = .112 and the mothers benefitted less from cleft-related activity on the internet (P = .013). The intervention group reported higher mean score for satisfaction with total cleft care (P = .001). There were no significant group differences regarding mean total score for discharge teaching (P = .315) and coping difficulties (P = .919). CONCLUSION: Early follow-up by a SCN with expertise in cleft care is highly valued by parents. Closer cooperation between the cleft team and health professionals at birth hospitals and Child health centers is necessary for optimal follow-up.